Group 1
Positive: They were
clear about their purpose from the beginning, and everything was very well
organized and well prepared.
Negative: I was a
little confused by the bar graph that showed the results of the On-Campus Meal
Survey.
Group 2
Positive: Each of
the presenters contributed equally to the discussion.
Negative: Although
the cost was addressed, the plan for paying for the new building wasn't
addressed.
Group 3
Positive: The plan
was well thought out and presented very thoroughly, with important details.
Negative: I thought
there was a little too much information on the slides.
Group 4
Positive: The slides
were put together very well, and were very clear.
Negative: I wondered
how this app was different from other apps that already exist.
Group 5
Positive: The slides
were simple, and were used to enhance the presentation rather than as the focus
of the presentation.
Negative: I would
have liked to know more about what kind of tools the van would have that would
enable it to do so many services.
Group 6
Positive: They
didn’t hide challenges, but addressed issues people might have with biodiesel,
and then talked about potential solutions.
Negative: The
picture under the US Department of Energy slide had a little too much
information for one slide.
Group 7
Positive: The
pictures in the slide were very simple and applicable.
Negative: I would
have like to know why people are opposed to using chainsaws to clear trails.
Are there any downsides?
Group 8
Positive: The plan
was simple and presented very clearly. The chart with the application deadlines
was easy to understand.
Negative: I would
suggest sharing the statistics before the conclusion. Share them as a part of
the cost/benefit section.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.